ŽIVOTNÉ PROSTREDIE AKO PREDMET SOCIÁLNEJ PRÁCE / THE ENVIRONMENT AS A SUBJECT OF SOCIAL WORK
Keywords:
KLIMATICKÁ KRÍZA , SOCIÁLNA PRÁCA , ŽIVOTNÉ PROSTREDIE , KOMPETENCIE , ENVIRONMENTÁLNA SOCIÁLNA PRÁCA , CLIMATE CRISIS , SOCIAL WORK , ENVIRONMENT , COMPETENCIES , ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL WORKAbstract
Abstrakt
Klimatické zmeny, ktoré prebiehajú v ostatných desaťročiach posilnili záujem o životné prostredie v rámci viacerých profesií. V rámci sociálnej práce sa vytvorilo viacero prístupov, ktoré sa zaoberajú otázkou významu životného prostredia pre klientov sociálnej práce. Cieľom príspevku, ktorý je ukotvený v teóriách environmentálnej spravodlivosti, je priblížiť aktuálne trendy reflektovania životného prostredia v kontexte sociálnej práce. V tomto kontexte sa potom mení aj optika profesie sociálna práca, s čím sú spojené nové úlohy a kompetencie sociálnych pracovníkov. Príspevok, ktorý má charakter teoretickej štúdie, nemá ambíciu predstaviť problematiku v jej komplexnosti, ale ponúknuť čitateľovi odpoveď na otázky „Aký význam sa pripisuje životnému prostrediu v súčasnej sociálnej práci?“ a „Čo je environmentálna sociálna práca?“. Pre spracovanie príspevku boli použité klasické metódy teoretického skúmania ako analýza, syntéza a komparácia.
Abstract
Climate changes that is ongoing in recent decades have strengthened the interest in the environment within several professions. Within social work, several approaches have been created that deal with the issue of the importance of the environment for social work clients. The goal of the contribution, which is anchored in the theories of environmental justice, is to approach the current trends of reflecting the environment in the context of social work. In this context, the optics of the social work profession is also changing, which is connected with new tasks and competencies of social workers. The contribution, which has the character of a theoretical study, does not aim to present the issue in its complexity, but to offer the reader an answer to the questions "What importance is given to the environment in contemporary social work?" and "What is environmental social work?". Classical methods of theoretical research, such as analysis, synthesis and comparison, were used to process the contribution.
References
ADAMS, R. 2008. Empowerment, Participation and Social Work, 3rd ed.; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2008. ISBN 0230019994.
BERRY, T. 1988. The dream of the Earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club. ISBN 19901988.
BERRY, T. 1999. The great work: Our way into the future. New York: Bell Tower. ISBN 0609605259.
BESTHORN, F. 2002. Is it time for a new ecological approach to social work: What is the environment telling us? The Spirituality and Social Work Forum , Winter, (p. 1,6-7).
BlLOWERS, A. 2003. Inequality and community: The missing dimensions of sustainable development. In: BUCKINGHAM, S., K. THEOBALD (Eds.) 2003. Local environmental sustainability, Boston, Woodhead Publishing Limited. ISBN: 1 85573 531 8, pp. 235–250.
BORGMANN, A. 1984 Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226066282.
BURELLI, C., D. PALA. 2021. The Envronmental Crisis and Its Injustice. An (Inevitably Short). Introduction [online] Rivista di estetica, 75, p. 13-16. [2022-04-06] Dostupné na https://doi.org/10.4000/estetica.7190.
CANDA, E. R. 2005. The future of spirituality in social work: The farther reaches of human nurture. [online]. Advances in Social Work . 6(1), 97–108. [2022-04-04] Dostupné na DOI: https://doi.org/10.18060/83.
CARINGTON, D. 2017. The seven megatrends that could beat global warming: 'There is reason for hope' [online]. The Guardian. [2022-2-12]. Dostupné na: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/nov/08/seven-megatrends-that-could-beat-global-warming-climate-change.
COATES, J. 2003. Exploring the Roots of the Environmental Crisis: Opportunity for Social Transformation. [online]. Critical Social Work. An interdisciplinary Journal dedicated to social justice. Social Work and Ecology. 4(1). [2022-03-15] Dostupné na: https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5631.
COATES, J. 2004. Ecology and social work: Toward a new paradigm. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing. ISBN-13: 978-1552661079.
COLBORN, T., D. DUMANOSKI, J. MYERS. 1997. Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival?-A Scientific Detective Story. Middlesex: Plume, ISBN -13: 978-0452274143.
DOMINELLI, L. 2013. Environmental justice at the heart of social work practice: Greening the profession. [online]. International Journal of Social Welfare. 22(4):431-439. [2022-03-23]. Dostupné na: https://doi.org./10.1111/ijsw.12024.
EARLEY, P.C. 1997. Face, harmony, and social structure: An analysis of organizational behavior across cultures. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN-13: 978-0195110074
EHRLICH, P. R. 1997. Population bomb. Cutchogue, NY: Buccaneer Books Inc. ISBN: 978-1568495873.
EPSTEIN, M. 2010. Thinking straight about sustainability. Stanford Social Innovation Review , 8(3): 50–55.
FAUX, J. 2006. The global class war: How America's bipartisan elite lost our future and what it will take to win it back. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. ISBN 471 697 613
FRY, T. 2011. Design as politics. Oxford: Berg. ISBN: 978 1 84788 567 8.
GORE, A. 1992. Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, ISBN 0-395-57821-3.
GRAY, M., J. COATES. 2015. Changing gears: shifting to an environmental perspective in social work education. [online] Social Work Education, 34(5): 502-5012, [2022-04-14] . Dostupné na: doi: 10.1080/02615479.2015.1065807.
HART, S. L. 2010. Capitalism at the crossroads: Next generation business strategies for a postcrisis world, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing. ISBN: 13: 978-0137042326.
HAWKEN, P. 2010. The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability, revised edn. New York: Harper Busisness. ISBN-13 : 978-0061252792.
JOHNSTON,P., M. EVERARD, D. SANTILLO, K. H. ROBERT 2007. Reclaiming the Definition of Sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 14(1):60-66.
HOFF, M. D., POLACK, R. J. 1993. Social dimensions of the environmental crisis: Challenges for social work. Social Work 38(2):204–211.
JARVIS, D. 2013. Environmental Justice and Social Work: A Call to Expand the Social Work Profession to Include Environmental Justice. Columbia Social Work Review, 11(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.7916/cswr.v11i1.1935.
KEMP, S.P. 2011. Recentring Environment in Social Work Practice: Necessity, Opportunity, Challenge. British Social Work, 41, 1198–1210.
KORTEN, D. 1987. Third generation NGO strategies: a key to people-centred development. World Development, 151(1, Supplement):145-159.
KORTEN, D. 1995. Sustainable development: Conventional versus emergent alternative wisdom. A feature of the People-Centered Development Forum. [online]. Revisided 1995. Living Economics Forum. [2022-04-14]. Dostupné na: https://davidkorten.org/wisdom/.
KORTEN, D. 2007. The great turning: From empire to earth community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, ISBN-13 : 978-1887208086.
KORTEN, D. 2010. Agenda for a new economy: From phantom wealth to real wealth, 2nd ed. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler. ISBN-13 : 978-1605093758.
LEDERACH, J. P. 2010. The moral imagination: The art and soul of building peace. New York: Oxford University Press. New York: Oxford University Press; ISBN-13: 978-0199747580.
LEE, J. 2001. The Empowerment Approach to Social Work Practice, 2nd ed.; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001; ISBN 0231115482.
LEVICKÁ, J., K. LEVICKÁ, V. HANZALÍKOVÁ, A. BÁNOVČINOVÁ. 2012. Ekosociálne prístupy v sociálnej práci. Trnava: Oliva, ISBN 97880893321144.
LEVY, A., VAILLANCOURT , J-G. 2011. War on earth? Junctures between peace and the environment. In: Matyók, T., J. Senehi, S. Byrneeds. Critical issues in peace and conflict studies: Theory, practice, and pedagogy, pp. 217–244. Lanham, MD, Lexington Books.
LOVELOCK, J. 1979. Gaia: A new look at life on Earth. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19 286218-9.
MARLOW, C., C. Van ROOYEN. 2011. How Green Is the Environment in Social Work null [article]. Intenational Social. Work 44(2): 241–253. DOI: 10.1177/002087280104400208.
MATTHIES, A.L, K NÄHRI, D. WARD, 2001. The Eco-Social Approach in Social Work; Jyväskylä: SoPhi University Press:, Finland, 2001; pp. 54–83. ISBN 951-39-091-4-X.
McKINNON, J. 2008. Exploring the Nexus between Social Work and the Environment. [online]. Australian. Social. Work. 61(3): 256–268 [2022-02-17] Dostupne na: https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070802178275.
MEADOWS, Donella H., Denis, L. MEADOWS, Jørgen RANDERS, Wiliam W. BEHREMS III. 1972. The Limits the Geowth. A Reprort for the Club of Rome´s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. [online] New York: Universe Books. ISBN 0-87663-165-0 [2022-03-12] Dostupné na: https://www.donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Limits-to-Growth-digital-scan-version.pdf.
MEADOWS, Donella H. 2008. Thinking in System : A Primer. [online] London: Earthscan. ISBN: 978-1-84407-726-7. [2022-05-15]. Dostupné na: https://wtf.tw/ref/meadows.pdf.
MEADOWS, D. H. Thinking in System : A Primer. [online] London: Earthscan, [2022-05-15]. Dostupné na: https://wtf.tw/ref/meadows.pdf.
MEARNS, R., A. NORTON. 2010. Modelling biodiversity and ecosystem services in coupled ecological–economic systems. [online]. In: MEARNS, R. A. Norton (Eds). Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world, pp. 1–44. Washington, DC, The World Bank. [2022-02-22]. Dostupné na: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2689 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.”
MENDOZA, H. R., T. MATYÓK, T. 2012. We are not alone: When the number of exceptions to a rule exceeds its usefulness as a construct, it is time for a change. In: POLDOMA, T. (Ed.). 2012. Meanings of designed spaces. New York, Fairchild (Forthcoming). ISBN 9781609011451.
ORR, D. W. 2012. Down to the wire: Confronting climate collapse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN-13 : 978-0199829361.
PEETERS, J. 2012. Social work and sustainable development: Towards a social-ecological practice model. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice.21(3):5-26.
ROCHA, H. B. Social Work Practices and the Ecological Sustainability of Socially Vulnerable Communities. Sustainability 2018, 10(5), 1312; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051312
SHIVA, V. 2005. Earth democracy: Justice, sustainability, and peace. Cambridge, MA, South End Press. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, U.S. ISBN13 9781623170417.
SCHMITZ, C. L., T. MATYÓK, L.M. SLOAN, CH. D. JAMES. 2012. The relationship between social work and environmental sustainability: Implication for interdisciplinary practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(3),278-286. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00855.x.
STRIEŽENEC, Š. 2006. Teória a metodológia sociálnej práce. Trnava: Tripsoft. ISBN 8096939041.
WALKER, B., SALT, D. 2006. Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC, Island Press. ISBN-13 : 978-1597260930.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Develompnet). 1987. Our Comon Future. [online] New York: Oxford University Press. [2022-04-25] Dostupné na: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.
